还有一个重要的指标——准确率。伯克利函数调用排行榜 (BFCL) 是评估函数调用能力的标准基准。 Gemma 3 1B 的得分约为 31%，Llama 3.2 1B 约为 26%，两者未经微调的性能都很弱。由于 Gemma 3n 是通用型程序，因此未对其进行测试。Hammer 2.1 0.5B 没有公开数据，但其 1.5B 版本开箱即用的得分约为 73%——尽管它在 int8 内存中占用约 1.5GB 的空间，是 FunctionGemma（288MB）的 5 倍。
Watch: SpaceX loses Starship spacecraft but catches booster on seventh test flight
。Line官方版本下载是该领域的重要参考
�@���ɕ]�������Ă����̂��uPRO B550M-B�v���B�p�\�R���H�[ �H�t���p�[�c�ق́u�ǂ������V�K�ɍ����Ă������ł����ǁAPRO B550M-B�̕��́i�`�b�v�Z�b�g�I�ɖ{���ΏۊO�́jRyzen 3000 G�V���[�Y�����삷�����ă��[�J�[�̑Ή����X�g�ɍڂ��Ă������ł����BRyzen 5 3400G��3200G�Ƃ�����APU�Ƒg�ݍ��킹�đg�ނȂ炩�Ȃ��\�Z���}�������܂����A�����I�����ɂȂ��܂����ˁv�ƃv�b�V�����Ă����B
The performance characteristics are attractive with incredibly fast cold starts and minimal memory overhead. But the practical limitation is language support. You cannot run arbitrary Python scripts in WASM today without compiling the Python interpreter itself to WASM along with all its C extensions. For sandboxing arbitrary code in arbitrary languages, WASM is not yet viable. For sandboxing code you control the toolchain for, it is excellent. I am, however, quite curious if there is a future for WASM in general-purpose sandboxing. Browsers have spent decades solving a similar problem of executing untrusted code safely, and porting those architectural learnings to backend infrastructure feels like a natural evolution.